 |
|
 |
|
Our Training Philosophy
|
|
|
Our training
philosophy relies heavily on the
principles of positive reinforcement, a system which utilizes rewards
(food, praise and other) to bring about permanent changes in behavior.
Unlike systems which rely heavily on punishment, our training not only
imparts the necessary skills, but also builds the dog's confidence,
strengthens the dog's bond with its owner, and maintains a positive
attitude toward learning: just like children who enjoy school, dogs who
like their "work" tend to excel.
Years ago,
virtually everyone trained dogs by the
"yank and jerk" method. The theory was that the dog would learn to
avoid all behaviors that would be punished, resulting in a
well-trained, compliant animal that would not challenge the pack
leader.
This "alpha"
philosophy had both a historical and
empirical foundation and, for many owners, was reasonably successful in
achieving a more manageable pet.For many
dogs, however, this approach led to some serious consequences. Dogs
trained by primarily compulsive methods often tend to become timid and
submissive with their owners, fail to develop confidence, become
mistrusting, and most significant, may learn to fight back. This
"fighting back" can lead to more serious aggression directed toward the
owner, or become generalized as a style (strategy) in resolving
stress-related encounters with other people or dogs.
Enter operant conditioning. Pioneered by Dr. B. F. Skinner in the
1930's, its value as a training approach both in and out of the
laboratory became increasingly evident over the next four decades.
Creating a foundation for applying principles of learning to both
humans and animals, operant conditioning explained how to use positive
reinforcement, rather than punishment, to both reward desirable
behavior and maintain a positive attitude in the subject.
The sequence of stimulus > response > reward was embraced by
many, most notably marine mammal trainers, for which "punishment"
training was a dead end.
|
|
| |
|
Karen Pryor finally brought the
application of positive reinforcement
training for pets to the general public with the publication of the
hallmark work "Don't Shoot the Dog" authored in 1984. Today, most
enlightened trainers and behaviorists have adopted this positive
reinforcement strategy as a way of rewarding and modifying behavior.
The advantages are many. It gives the animal a more direct path to
success by showing it what "to do", and perhaps most important, avoids
the pitfalls of fear and intimidation often associated with punishment
training. It's also kinder and gentler, making the entire process more
acceptable for most dog owners.
But just as negative reinforcement training has consequences, the same
holds true for "purely positive" training. Rewarding desirable behavior
works well so long as the reinforcement (reward) offered is enough to
get the dog to respond not only when it wants
to, but also when it has
(doesn't want) to. If the positive reward is "treats", the additional
pitfall of dependence on the "reward" can lead to a dog that fails to
perform without continuous reward.
THE
COMMON SCENTS SYSTEM
With over 30 years
in the business of behavior modification,
we at Common Scents understand the advantages and disadvantages of both
positive and negative reinforcement training, and have developed a
training
philosophy which incorporates elements of both. Based
on the principle of establishing authority (benevolent
leadership) rather than dominance (intimidation), we first build a
positive
foundation for desirable behavior through a system of rewards. Next, we demonstrate how to maintain
desirable behavior, while at the same time preventing the dog from
becoming
dependent on the reward. Success is
achieved by first demanding a specific level of performance for a
reward
("raising the bar"), and then advancing to reinforcement on a random
basis, where the expectation of a reward is ever present, even though
the
reward may not be.
Our training is
not complete, however, until we integrate
the concept of "correction" into the program. Correction,
to differentiate from
"punishment", is only applied for “deliberate disobedience”, that is,
a situations where the dog clearly understands the command, has been
trained to
respond to it, and is not resisting out of fear or anxiety. In this
event, the
correction – voice or leash and collar only – is applied only to the
minimal
extent necessary (threshold) to get the desired response. The
purpose of the
“correction” is to put the dog in a position for praise (positive
reinforcement), rewarding the dog for the correct behavior.
This completes the
picture for the dog, who now learns to
respond both when it wants
to, and when it has to.
The end product is a well-rounded pet that
is confident, but also accepts the owner's authority without the
attendant
problems that both extremes of positive and negative enforcement
training may
create.
Want to know more? Please feel free to call us!
The American Veterinary Society of Animal
Behavior also has more information about the benefits of positive
reinforcement training.
AVSAB
Position Statement
*For ease of
understanding, we have stretched the
definition of some of the terms associated with operant conditioning
and
substituted more commonly used and understood words.
Copyright
Common Scents Canine Center, Inc. 2008. All rights reserved. Do not
copy or
re-print without permission
Common Scents
Canine Center - Offering professional, common sense dog
training, counseling and boarding. We serve residents of Oakland,
Genesee, Lapeer, Wayne, Macomb and Washtenaw counties as well as
outstate Michigan and clients from coast to coast.
Recommended by:
- Numerous veterinary clinics
- Professional organizations
- Clients
|
|
|
|
|
|