By Paul W Downing Lake Orion, MI
 






 











 

 

Our Training Philosophy


Our training philosophy relies heavily on the principles of positive reinforcement, a system which utilizes rewards (food, praise and other) to bring about permanent changes in behavior. Unlike systems which rely heavily on punishment, our training not only imparts the necessary skills, but also builds the dog's confidence, strengthens the dog's bond with its owner, and maintains a positive attitude toward learning: just like children who enjoy school, dogs who like their "work" tend to excel.

Years ago, virtually everyone trained dogs by the "yank and jerk" method. The theory was that the dog would learn to avoid all behaviors that would be punished, resulting in a well-trained, compliant animal that would not challenge the pack leader.

This "alpha" philosophy had both a historical and empirical foundation and, for many owners, was reasonably successful in achieving a more manageable pet.For many dogs, however, this approach led to some serious consequences. Dogs trained by primarily compulsive methods often tend to become timid and submissive with their owners, fail to develop confidence, become mistrusting, and most significant, may learn to fight back. This "fighting back" can lead to more serious aggression directed toward the owner, or become generalized as a style (strategy) in resolving stress-related encounters with other people or dogs.

Enter operant conditioning. Pioneered by Dr. B. F. Skinner in the 1930's, its value as a training approach both in and out of the laboratory became increasingly evident over the next four decades. Creating a foundation for applying principles of learning to both humans and animals, operant conditioning explained how to use positive reinforcement, rather than punishment, to both reward desirable behavior and maintain a positive attitude in the subject. The sequence of stimulus > response > reward was embraced by many, most notably marine mammal trainers, for which "punishment" training was a dead end.

 
 
Karen Pryor finally brought the application of positive reinforcement training for pets to the general public with the publication of the hallmark work "Don't Shoot the Dog" authored in 1984. Today, most enlightened trainers and behaviorists have adopted this positive reinforcement strategy as a way of rewarding and modifying behavior. The advantages are many. It gives the animal a more direct path to success by showing it what "to do", and perhaps most important, avoids the pitfalls of fear and intimidation often associated with punishment training. It's also kinder and gentler, making the entire process more acceptable for most dog owners.

But just as negative reinforcement training has consequences, the same holds true for "purely positive" training. Rewarding desirable behavior works well so long as the reinforcement (reward) offered is enough to get the dog to respond not only when it wants to, but also when it has (doesn't want) to. If the positive reward is "treats", the additional pitfall of dependence on the "reward" can lead to a dog that fails to perform without continuous reward.

THE COMMON SCENTS SYSTEM

With over 30 years in the business of behavior modification, we at Common Scents understand the advantages and disadvantages of both positive and negative reinforcement training, and have developed a training philosophy which incorporates elements of both.  Based on the principle of establishing authority (benevolent leadership) rather than dominance (intimidation), we first build a positive foundation for desirable behavior through a system of rewards.  Next, we demonstrate how to maintain desirable behavior, while at the same time preventing the dog from becoming dependent on the reward.   Success is achieved by first demanding a specific level of performance for a reward ("raising the bar"), and then advancing to reinforcement on a random basis, where the expectation of a reward is ever present, even though the reward may not be.

   Our training is not complete, however, until we integrate the concept of "correction" into the program.  Correction, to differentiate from "punishment", is only applied for “deliberate disobedience”, that is, a situations where the dog clearly understands the command, has been trained to respond to it, and is not resisting out of fear or anxiety. In this event, the correction – voice or leash and collar only – is applied only to the minimal extent necessary (threshold) to get the desired response. The purpose of the “correction” is to put the dog in a position for praise (positive reinforcement), rewarding the dog for the correct behavior.

This completes the picture for the dog, who now learns to respond both when it wants to, and when it has to.  The end product is a well-rounded pet that is confident, but also accepts the owner's authority without the attendant problems that both extremes of positive and negative enforcement training may create.

Want to know more?  Please feel free to call us!

The American Veterinary Society of Animal Behavior also has more information about the  benefits of positive reinforcement training.

AVSAB Position Statement


*For ease of understanding, we have stretched the definition of some of the terms associated with operant conditioning and substituted more commonly used and understood words.

Copyright Common Scents Canine Center, Inc. 2008. All rights reserved. Do not copy or re-print without permission


Common Scents Canine Center - Offering professional, common sense dog training, counseling and boarding. We serve residents of Oakland, Genesee, Lapeer, Wayne, Macomb and Washtenaw counties as well as outstate Michigan and clients from coast to coast.

Recommended by:
- Numerous veterinary clinics
- Professional organizations
- Clients



 
 



Copyright 2010, Common Scents Canine Center, Inc. Ortonville, MI